Home Newsletter Honored Guests Blog About Us Work With Us Sponsor & Advertise Be a Guest The Production Suite Get the Briefing
Skip to main content

Open Door Salon

Pavel Khrimian

Pavel Khrimian

Co-founder & Chief Business Officer, Deka Biosciences

Pavel Khrimian is Co-founder and Chief Business Officer of Deka Biosciences. A first-generation immigrant who moved from pharma business development into entrepreneurship, he co-founded the company from inception, raised approximately eighty million dollars, built a team of thirty-five, and advanced a lead asset into phase one with a second program in IND-enabling work.

He spent most of 2026 leading the company through a wind-down after a pharma collaboration collapsed at the diligence stage. He describes negotiating for months, finalizing a term sheet and completing diligence before the counterparty changed direction, and is clear that the conduct on the way out mattered to him: the relationships were kept intact because the ecosystem is small and the same people meet again.

On Open Door Salon he sets out the three questions he uses to separate a pivot from a closure, and argues that the harder obligation is the one that survives the company. Patients on therapy stay on therapy, which turns a wind-down into an operational problem of narrowing sites and continuing to ship drug while cost is cut everywhere else. He describes himself now as an operator and biotech company builder, and intends to build again.

Frequently Asked Questions About Pavel Khrimian

Who is Pavel Khrimian?

Pavel Khrimian is Co-founder and Chief Business Officer of Deka Biosciences. He moved from pharma business development into entrepreneurship and co-founded the company from inception. He spent most of 2026 leading Deka Biosciences through a wind-down after a pharma collaboration collapsed at the diligence stage. He describes himself as an operator and biotech company builder, and intends to build again.

What did Pavel Khrimian build at Deka Biosciences?

Pavel Khrimian co-founded Deka Biosciences and built it from inception. He raised approximately eighty million dollars, built a team of thirty-five, and advanced a lead asset into phase one with a second program in IND-enabling work. That work ended in 2026, when the company wound down.

How does Pavel Khrimian decide between a pivot and a closure?

Pavel Khrimian works from three questions he uses to separate a pivot from a closure, a framework he set out on Open Door Salon. He treats the common failure as a company ignoring its own signals: “what I have seen done not so successfully is when some data points are ignored”. He also holds that execution carries no guarantee, since a company can do everything right and still miss the outcome it wanted.

What does Pavel Khrimian say a wind-down owes patients?

Pavel Khrimian argues that the obligation to patients survives the company. Patients on therapy stay on therapy, which turns a wind-down into an operational problem of narrowing sites and continuing to ship drug while cost is cut everywhere else. On Open Door Salon he framed it as a duty: “We have the fiduciary responsibility to continue to treat these patients until they come off therapy.”

How does Pavel Khrimian handle a collapsed pharma deal?

Pavel Khrimian negotiated for months, finalized a term sheet and completed diligence before the counterparty changed direction, which is what triggered the Deka Biosciences wind-down. He is clear that conduct on the way out mattered to him and that the relationships were kept intact, because the industry is small and the same people meet again: “we didn’t burn bridges along the way. It’s an ecosystem. It’s a small world.”

On Open Door Salon

“David Esposito and Pavel Khrimian on What the Last 90 Days of a Biotech Wind-Down Look Like”
David Esposito & Pavel Khrimian · September 2, 2026

Episode page & show notes on Open Door Salon

“You can do everything right. You still are not guaranteed the successful outcome that you want”Pavel Khrimian, on Open Door Salon (on the limits of execution)
“what I have seen done not so successfully is when some data points are ignored”Pavel Khrimian, on Open Door Salon (on the common failure in reading a company’s own signals)
“We have the fiduciary responsibility to continue to treat these patients until they come off therapy.”Pavel Khrimian, on Open Door Salon (on what a company still owes patients during a wind-down)
“we didn’t burn bridges along the way. It’s an ecosystem. It’s a small world.”Pavel Khrimian, on Open Door Salon (on conduct when a deal collapses)

In this episode

  • Exits, launches, and companies taken into bankruptcy
  • Letting go of the obsession with control
  • Reading a new data point and deciding whether to pivot
  • Build a base case, then watch it move
  • Why it is always about the team
  • Doing everything right and still losing
  • The ninety days before the decision
  • When a pharma collaboration collapses in diligence
  • Pivot or close: the three questions
  • Investors, patients, and your team at the same time
  • The obligation to patients still on therapy

Topics

Biotech Wind-DownsPharma Business DevelopmentPivot or Close DecisionsPatient Obligations During ClosureRaising and Deploying Venture Capital

Watch on Open Door Salon

What the Last 90 Days of a Biotech Wind-Down Actually Look Like | David Esposito & Pavel Khrimian

Open Door Salon brings life-sciences leaders into candid conversation. Every Monday, the week's takeaways land in your inbox.

Subscribe on Substack →
The Briefing

Need the life-sciences signal but short on time?

Get the free quarterly briefing: every guest from the quarter, in one sitting. What decides whether a therapy reaches a patient, gets funded, and can be trusted.